The documents provided are for informational purposes only and are NOT the Official Board Record. Please read the Board Disclaimer before reviewing any information on this site. |
Consent # | Description | |
Consent # 1 |
October 18, 2004 Settlement Report of agreement regarding certain capital projects as proposed by NLH |
|
|
|
|
Undertaking # | Description | |
U Hydro # 1 |
October 6, 2004 Requested by Industrial Customers of TRO Panel - Transcript October 6, 2004 - pg. 126 Please explain why there is $19,872 for the year 2005 under the column “Operator” in the “Retire Plant” alternative in the analysis on page 2 of IC-18NLH. |
|
U Hydro # 2 |
October 6, 2004 Requested by Industrial Customers of TRO Panel - Transcript October 6, 2004 - pg. 127 Please explain the $13,113 under the column “Capacity” commencing in year 2011 for the “Retire Plant” alternative in the analysis on page 2 of IC-18NLH. |
|
U Hydro # 3 |
October 6, 2004 Requested by Industrial Customers of TRO Panel - Transcript October 6, 2004 - pg. 134 Provide a breakdown of the projects included in B-103 |
|
U Hydro # 4 |
October 6, 2004 Requested by Industrial Customers of TRO Panel - Transcript October 6, 2004 - pg. 148 Re: criteria for light duty mobile equipment – Are there any additions to mobile equipment fleet associated with this $260,000 or is this all replacement? Verbal Reply: Transcript October 7, 2004 Page 7 |
|
U Hydro # 5 |
October 6, 2004 Requested by Industrial Customers of TRO Panel - Transcript October 6, 2004 - pg. 150 Are there any new allocations of light duty vehicles associated with Project A-8 for $260,000 Verbal Reply: Transcript October 7, 2004 Page 7-8 |
|
U Hydro # 6 |
October 6, 2004 Requested by Industrial Customers of TRO Panel - Transcript October 6, 2004 - pg. 180 Re: reconciliation of B-83 from last year with B-147 from this year, relating to vehicles and the average age of the vehicles being replaced Verbal Reply: Transcript October 7, 2004 Page 72-75 |
|
U Hydro # 7 |
October 6, 2004 Requested by Industrial Customers of TRO Panel - Transcript October 6, 2004 - pg. 190 Re: transmission line work being done for 2005 under the wood pole management program – identify the lines that are going too be replaced in the first year of those 4000 poles. Verbal Reply: Transcript October 7, 2004 Page 75 |
|
U Hydro # 8 |
October 7, 2004 Requested by Industrial Customers of TRO Panel - Transcript October 7, 2004 Please explain how the $13,113 under the column “Capacity” commencing in year 2011 for the “Retire Plant” alternative in the analysis on page 2 of IC-18NLH is calculated. Similarly, explain how the $45,895 under the column “Capacity” in year 2011 for the “Retire Plant in 2006: of the Snook’s Arm Penstock Replacement Analysis is calculated. |
|
|
|
|
Exhibit # | Description | |
FM/GH # 1 |
October 6, 2004 Slide Presentation By Hydro Transmission and Rural Operations |
|
JRH # 1 |
October 7, 2004 Slide Presentation By Hydro Production |
|
GD # 1 |
October 8, 2004 Slide Presentation By Hydro Hydro's VHF Mobile Radio System Replacement |
|
|
|
|
Information # | Description | |
Information # 1 |
October 10, 2004 Grant Thornton: NLH 2003 Average Rate Base |
|
|
|