|
UNDERTAKINGS
|
|
Undertaking # 1
|
Date: February 13, 2012
Requested by: Consumer Advocate
Witness: Nalcor Panel
- Transcript Reference: Feb 13, 2012 Pgs 144-146
Date when Carbon Tax would have been applicable
Response
Transcript
Feb 14, Page 2
Reference
Exhibit 101-
Page 65 of the Navigant report
|
| |
|
Undertaking # 2
|
Date: February 13, 2012
Requested by: Chair
Witness: Nalcor Panel
Re: Carbon Tax
- Transcript Reference: Feb 13, 2012 Pgs 144-146
Cost per ton?
Response
Transcript
Feb 15, Page 93
Lines 6-10
|
| |
|
Undertaking # 3
|
Date: February 13, 2012
Requested by: Consumer Advocate
Witness: Nalcor Panel
- Transcript Reference: Feb 13, 2012 Pgs 170 -171
And if we went further and said, you know, one in 500, (as opposed to one in 150)
what would be the incremental cost versus your existing DG 2 design?
Response
RE: Transcript
Feb 14, Page 3-4
Response from
Gilbert Bennett
|
| |
|
Undertaking # 4
|
Date: February 13, 2012
Requested by: Consumer Advocate
Witness: Nalcor Panel
- Transcript Reference: Feb 13, 2012 Pgs 219-220
Confirm whether NEB is using weather adjusted prices?
Response
RE: Transcript
Feb 14, Page 4
Response from
Steve Goudie
|
| |
|
Undertaking # 5
|
Date: February 14, 2012
Requested by: Board Counsel
Witness: Nalcor Panel (Mr. Humphries)
- Transcript Reference: Feb 14, 2012 Pgs 15-16
RE: Dates of Energy Deficit/Capacity Shortfall
…if you would be able to provide that information
Response
RE: Transcript
Feb 15, Page 99
Response from
Paul Humphries
|
| |
|
Undertaking # 6
|
Date: February 14, 2012
Requested by: Board Counsel
Witness: Nalcor Panel (Mr. Stratton)
- Transcript Reference: Feb 14, 2012 Pgs 37-38
Re: Vale Load
Perhaps what we could have is just confirmation of the change in terms of what
was in the reference case and what it’s now, so we’re dealing with some harder
numbers maybe.
Response
RE: Transcript
Feb 15, Page 94
Line 8
Response from
Paul Stratton
|
| |
|
Undertaking # 7
|
Date: February 14, 2012
Requested by: Board Counsel
Witness: Nalcor Panel (Mr. Harrington)
- Transcript Reference: Feb 14, 2012 Pgs 62-63
Re: Total Value of tenders
… if Nalcor could provide an indication
of the value of the tenders that are listed as
being ready to be awarded or that are pending,
the ones they have listed on the
website?
Response
Response by letter dated February 24, 2012
|
| |
|
Undertaking # 8
|
Date: February 14, 2012
Requested by: Board Counsel
Witness: Nalcor Panel (Mr. Bennett)
- Transcript Reference: Feb 14, 2012 Pgs 70
Re: Alpine region
…to give us an indication of the costs involved
in adding the additional
transmission line
reliability enhancements in the Alpine regions?
Response
RE: Transcript
Feb 15, Page 95-96
Response from
Gilbert Bennett
|
| |
|
Undertaking # 9
|
Date: February 16, 2012
Requested by: Board Counsel
Witness: Nalcor Panel
- Transcript Reference: Feb 16, 2012 Pgs 50
RE: analysis or assessment done - system integration studies in 1998 and in 2010
…if there was that internal type of analysis done, the Board requests as an
undertaking…
Response
Response by letter dated February 24, 2012
|
| |
| |
|
Undertaking # 10
|
Date: February 20, 2012
Requested by: Chair
Witness: Nalcor Panel
- Transcript Reference: Feb 20, 2012 Pg 23
…What is the internal number of the price of oil that Nalcor is using….
Response
Filed as Confidential Exhibit
|
| |
|
|
Muskrat Falls Review - Main Page
|
